QUOTE (kc_224 @ May 27 2009, 12:39 AM)

I agree with you, i have watched it several times as well and "wet dream" never came to mind. i see a man who can't sleep and loves chloe so much she is on his mind no matter what he does. I also liked the added bonus of seeing him in his boxers. as for children watching, what would they be watching this type of program if there parents are around?,
QUOTE (FRSixburgh @ May 26 2009, 11:28 PM)

I watched it over and over on youtube on the weekend and I never thought "wet dream" until I read some of the comments. He just looked like a man having a dream about making love to the gal he is in love with, then getting jolted that he is still remembering her so vividly, and waking up. I doubt that it was meant to come off that way (wet dream) but some of these viewers have a one-track mind. They accuse Danloe as being porn and then only see sex in everything they do. I loved the dream sequence..at least Daniel is sexy & looked hot in his boxers. Lucas, on the other hand, make my skin crawl.
ITA, I can't stand Lucas with Chloe and I thought that Daniel's dream, while a bit "vivid", was completely believable. I'm glad to hear that others thought the same thing. I mean, lots of real guys sleep in boxers and I totally "bought" that Daniel was just having a difficult time sleeping/keeping Chloe off his mind. I think that is one of the things that I like about the way SC plays Daniel -- he seems more realistic to me (if there is such a thing on a soap). I mean, Daniel's character may not go around gushing sweet nothings to Chloe, but I like the fact that he not all mushy -- none of this namby-pamby "my darling, my dearest...crap" that we see elsewhere on Days coming from Daniel. Nothing wrong with that in my book -- so IMO the dream made perfect sense and the way SC played Daniel's angst was perfect. (Not to mention that he looked damn near perfect doing it!)
Anyway...I think that a lot of people on the main forum "have it in" for Daniel because Danloe isn't the typical soapy, "romantic" s/l (and to each their own -- even I like a little of that...), but I for one like it when the characters involved seem more like real people. JMHO. And I also think that there are those that can't handle that the romance here is somewhat based on the fact that Daniel and Chloe have an obvious physical attraction/connection that neither can deny. To me, that's all part of the equation of true love -- gotta be some sparks from the beginning or else no romance is gonna even develop -- and IMO they've definitely got sparks!
Oh, and as for kids watching -- I actually don't think most kids who are old enough to really pay attention would want to watch this to begin with!! I mean, my 8-year old (who isn't allowed to watch Days) would probably see it and say "eww, yuck... kissing..." and walk away!
But if she did happen to have seen that dream sequence, she'd have not thought of anything other than "there's a guy in bed in his shorts". Thank goodness for childhood innocence! And ITA with the last poster -- most kids shouldn't have access to it to begin with!! (But I know all parents don't always do what they are supposed to, so that's why I mentioned that it might have been inappropriate in my o/p...)
Anyway...just glad to see that I'm not considered a perv because I thought Dr. Dan looked hot as heck the other day!

Just wondered what everyone else thought!